The next big Wi-Fi standard is for sensing, not communication (2021)

Re:The next big Wi-Fi standard is for sensing, not communica... by pizza on Wednesday January 12, 2022 @09:53AM (#29907060)

Another idea in the opposite direction: somebody should build a $20 firewall/tappable ethernet cable with some kind of builtin eBPF support + a universe of community packages.

The community would then share privacy-enhancing I/O profiles for every kind of device. If years later e.g. my adversarial lightbulb pivots to brokering kompromat SIGINT, I want to filter that out, and I want not to be the first one to write a filter like that..

Does it change the internal state of the lightbulb’s logic? No.. but hopefully it would even be able to simulate the state loop of the lightbulb well enough to guess what to filter out.

Of course there may also come a time when somebody starts to sell $20, 60 ghz-spectrum-only-visible “human activity fakers” to disrupt the collection of such data. Maybe with a “Honey, I’m home!” package being the most popular, lol

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The next big Wi-Fi standard is for sensing, not communica... by 1MachineElf on Wednesday January 12, 2022 @10:03AM (#29907231)

When I read this comment and the username that wrote it, I can't help but wonder if it's a reference to Neal Stephenson's Snow Crash.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The next big Wi-Fi standard is for sensing, not communica... by pizza on Wednesday January 12, 2022 @10:15AM (#29907459)

Funny, when I first signed up it was a reference to a joke that a pizza with radius z and thickness a, its volume is pizza. It's only since then that I've read Snow Crash (a book I do think about quite often..) maybe I should retcon my etymology lol

[ Parent | on HN ]