News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:State of Machine Learning in Julia by usgroup on Wednesday January 12, 2022 @06:52AM (#29905116)
The responses confuse "machine learning" with neural networks so far as I can see. I do lots of statsy things: good luck with that outside of R.
Re:State of Machine Learning in Julia by fault1 on Wednesday January 12, 2022 @08:13AM (#29905913)
Re:State of Machine Learning in Julia by usgroup on Wednesday January 12, 2022 @11:28AM (#29908828)
Until you've used: https://r-nimble.org/
Re:State of Machine Learning in Julia by fault1 on Wednesday January 12, 2022 @02:25PM (#29911618)
looks good!

The ecosystem in Julia is quite strong for MCMC libs because people do not have to lower something to C++ to develop such a library: https://discourse.julialang.org/t/mcmc-landscape/25654/

Of course, for users, they might prefer something like Turing, but I think the Julia tends to blur the differences between user and developer more so than in most other languages (for good or worse) since everything is in one language.

Re:State of Machine Learning in Julia by malshe on Wednesday January 12, 2022 @12:38PM (#29910108)
Thanks! Didn't know this exists
Re:State of Machine Learning in Julia by dunefox on Wednesday January 12, 2022 @02:22PM (#29911584)
> good luck with that outside of R.

There's always RCall for R inside of Julia, the best of both worlds.

Re:State of Machine Learning in Julia by jiggunjer on Wednesday January 12, 2022 @06:58AM (#29905157)
Even professors doing trendy "AI" research conflate the two terms.
Re:State of Machine Learning in Julia by dagw on Wednesday January 12, 2022 @10:35AM (#29907778)
Even professors doing trendy "AI" research conflate the two terms.

Only because doing "AI" gets you bigger grants.

Re:State of Machine Learning in Julia by kgwgk on Wednesday January 12, 2022 @11:33AM (#29908944)
Tibshirani's Glossary

   Machine learning               Statistics

   network, graphs                model
   weights                        parameters
   learning                       fitting
   generalization                 test set performance 
   supervised learning            regression/classification
   unsupervised learning          density estimation, clustering

   large grant = $1,000,000       large grant = $50,000

   nice place to have a meeting:  nice place to have a meeting:
    Snowbird, Utah, French Alps    Las Vegas in August
Re:State of Machine Learning in Julia by sethaxen on Wednesday January 12, 2022 @09:21AM (#29906603)
Statistics is usually considered a subset of ML, except maybe by statisticians.

While R definitely leads the pack on variety of useful stats packages, there are excellent tools for certain tasks in other languages. I do a lot of probabilistic programming, and PyMC in Python and Turing in Julia are excellent packages. And both languages have official Stan interfaces. Not knowing R has not been a problem for me.

Re:State of Machine Learning in Julia by dmicah on Wednesday January 12, 2022 @10:32AM (#29907730)
I'm sure it depends on your vantage point, but I would argue that ML is more likely to be considered a subset of Statistics than the other way around.
Re:State of Machine Learning in Julia by kgwgk on Wednesday January 12, 2022 @11:26AM (#29908791)
Re:State of Machine Learning in Julia by usgroup on Wednesday January 12, 2022 @11:26AM (#29908794)
It just means that you have problems you're not aware of :-)
Re:State of Machine Learning in Julia by sethaxen on Thursday January 13, 2022 @03:58AM (#29918388)
or that the tooling for the problems I do have is adequate in multiple languages.