News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Intel removes Xinjiang references from shareholder letter by chasd00 on Tuesday January 11, 2022 @12:28PM (#29894558)
That is such a disingenuous malevolent comment that i want to preserve it and the context in case you get downvoted off the screen.

"So essentially something that's considered perfectly normal in American prisons. Bit of a double standards, don't you think?" by trasz

in response to

"They are rounded up, regardless of their crimes. 1M+ people have been put in a camp where they are raped, beaten, medically experimented on, re-educated and indoctrinated to praise the CCP, shipped to factories around the country to work without pay, if they escape their families are punished. While Uyghur men are in these camps, Han Chinese men move in with the families left behind and treat the women and children as slaves. They literally buy them. It’s disgusting. It’s evil. See this: https://www.reddit.com/r/JoeRogan/comments/ohob7b/uyghur_wom..."

by: ei8htyfi5e

Re:Intel removes Xinjiang references from shareholder letter by trasz on Tuesday January 11, 2022 @02:41PM (#29896712)
So your claim is that prisoners in USA have never been "raped, beaten, medically experimented on, re-educated and indoctrinated to praise the CCP, shipped to factories around the country to work without pay"? (I've skipped the obviously absurd part, although if you count the slavery...)

Essentially: try to distinguish between information about facts - which is largely true - and the narration being built around it.

Re:Intel removes Xinjiang references from shareholder letter by network2592 on Tuesday January 11, 2022 @02:56PM (#29896915)
Modern slavery is a fact [0]. Xinjiang is specifically mentioned. Wu Mao is also a fact [1]. Both sources are wikipedia. What is your preferred source of facts?

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modern_slavery

[1] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29893724