Re:I went back to using a ThinkPad from 2012
by jodrellblank on Monday January 10, 2022 @11:36AM
(#29877385)
> “The reason I suggested handling one is the build quality for a first gen device is hard to believe until you hold one and use it for a few days or weeks.”
“one of the worst purchases I've ever made. [...] This last point is pretty minor, but the hinges are floppy. The whole screen shakes around when I type on it.“
“Build quality. I'm convinced if I drop this thing it's all over.
All in all I'm mad at myself for spending over $3k on a productivity configuration centered around what is pretty much beta hardware. I should have known better.”
“Re build quality: yes, it is a bit flimsier than I would like (though have definitely used laptops that are way worse)”
> “All it has to do is last 2-3 years without much ado, which it probably will”
If that’s all you need why wouldn’t you buy a non-upgradeable one? It’ll be thinner, lighter and less fuss. The framework seems to be targeted at people who want a decade of use with upgrades.
I haven’t seen one, but that’s at odds with peoples comments in this thread from last week: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29806430
“one of the worst purchases I've ever made. [...] This last point is pretty minor, but the hinges are floppy. The whole screen shakes around when I type on it.“
“Build quality. I'm convinced if I drop this thing it's all over. All in all I'm mad at myself for spending over $3k on a productivity configuration centered around what is pretty much beta hardware. I should have known better.”
“Re build quality: yes, it is a bit flimsier than I would like (though have definitely used laptops that are way worse)”
> “All it has to do is last 2-3 years without much ado, which it probably will”
If that’s all you need why wouldn’t you buy a non-upgradeable one? It’ll be thinner, lighter and less fuss. The framework seems to be targeted at people who want a decade of use with upgrades.