Re:Making Open Source economy more viable with dual license ...
by josephcsible on Monday January 10, 2022 @11:34AM
(#29877357)
Of the root article, yes. But it doesn't sound like that's the intent of your license.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Making Open Source economy more viable with dual license ...
by rndhouse on Monday January 10, 2022 @12:22PM
(#29878140)
You asked:
> But if your license isn't open source, then what good is it for monetizing open source programs?
The OpenFare License is the commercial license that I believe should be used in the dual licensing circumstance described in the article. Thereby helping to monetizing open source programs.
The OpenFare License intends to provide that commercial aspect whilst being equivalent to the MIT License where possible.
Re:Making Open Source economy more viable with dual license ...
by josephcsible on Monday January 10, 2022 @12:26PM
(#29878216)
Okay. I didn't expect that to be the case, but I'm happy to hear that it is.