Re:Fossils of a Prehistoric Rainforest Hide in Australia’s R...
by briga on Sunday January 09, 2022 @04:58PM
(#29867729)
Considering that the Aborigines spent tens of thousands of years doing controlled burns (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fire-stick_farming), it's quite likely the ecosystem and climate changed quite a bit in that time, much like every piece of land humans have touched.
Re:Fossils of a Prehistoric Rainforest Hide in Australia’s R...
by landemva on Sunday January 09, 2022 @06:45PM
(#29868692)
The Vikings lost that battle in Greenland when global cooling covered it with snow and ice.
Re:Fossils of a Prehistoric Rainforest Hide in Australia’s R...
by briga on Sunday January 09, 2022 @09:50PM
(#29870021)
Well that still remains to be seen
Re:Fossils of a Prehistoric Rainforest Hide in Australia’s R...
by femto on Sunday January 09, 2022 @07:17PM
(#29868975)
Aboriginal oral tradition is often an accurate historical record:
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2015-10-16/research-gives-merit-...
As the article notes, oral tradition has "error correction" built into it as multiple generations overlap and check each other's accuracy of retelling. It's not like a game of "telephone", where the message gets repeated only once.
Re:Fossils of a Prehistoric Rainforest Hide in Australia’s R...
by morphle on Sunday January 09, 2022 @08:27PM
(#29869469)
Re:Fossils of a Prehistoric Rainforest Hide in Australia’s R...
by Tagbert on Sunday January 09, 2022 @10:57PM
(#29870433)
I recognize that the Aboriginal and other oral traditions preserve information for a long time, but this article is talking about climate from before the end of the Miocene around 5 million years ago. If the stores were about a previous climate it was a much younger climate than this one.
If anything, really shows how the “traditional” knowledge that I personally did not consider much before may be worth taking a second look at.