News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Elizabeth Holmes found guilty by topaz0 on Friday January 07, 2022 @06:25PM (#29846400)
It's meaningless if nothing is better about how you're doing it. Presumably in this case the thing they wanted to improve was the amount of sample you need to use, not the false positive/negative rates.
Re:Elizabeth Holmes found guilty by CRConrad on Saturday January 08, 2022 @07:20AM (#29850989)
But they knew at the time they were peddling it that they didn't yet have that advantage. So selling it on the premise that they did was... Well, fraudulent, in my book.