Re:Bitcoin Sinks to $41,000 Amid ‘Extreme Fear’
by Spivak on Friday January 07, 2022 @09:58AM
(#29839813)
Huh, but stablecoins are basically banks with a funny system for tracking account balances. Who's investing in a stablecoin they expect to go to the moon?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Bitcoin Sinks to $41,000 Amid ‘Extreme Fear’
by cmevidence on Friday January 07, 2022 @10:06AM
(#29839923)
people don't "invest in" stable coins, but stable coins are used as a fiat equivalent on an exchange: people buy and sell into stable coins (or, more accurately, buy and sell into USDT because Tether is >90% of stable coin volume). As such, if Tether (the organisation) want to pump up the price, they can print lots of tether and use it to buy assets.
Re:Bitcoin Sinks to $41,000 Amid ‘Extreme Fear’
by BobbyJo on Friday January 07, 2022 @10:05AM
(#29839912)
Something can be a security and not an investment. I would consider tether a security, but not an investment.
Re:Bitcoin Sinks to $41,000 Amid ‘Extreme Fear’
by dcolkitt on Friday January 07, 2022 @01:30PM
(#29842808)
That's not what the Howie test says. In US law a security requires the expectation of earning a profit.
Re:Bitcoin Sinks to $41,000 Amid ‘Extreme Fear’
by BobbyJo on Saturday January 08, 2022 @06:48PM
(#29857951)
'Security' is an English word that exists outside US law, and refers to contracts in a more general sense than strictly 'investment'. I don't think OP was using the word that way, hence my response.
The comment I was responding too seemed to add meaning that I didn't read in the OPs comment. I may be wrong, but it was my intent to clarify based on my own reading.