Re:Bound to Fail: The Rise and Fall of the Liberal Internati...
by AniseAbyss on Friday January 07, 2022 @09:14AM
(#29839296)
Are revolutions undemocratic? Would Mao have won the Chinese civil war if he did not in fact have the support of the people?
Democracy is not inherently stable, in fact I would argue they are the opposite. An election is like flipping a coin.
Re:Bound to Fail: The Rise and Fall of the Liberal Internati...
by notahacker on Friday January 07, 2022 @09:23AM
(#29839396)
An election is like flipping a coin that lands on a side with relatively substantial weight of public support (quirks of electoral systems mean it's not guaranteed to be the most popular or least unpopular side, but unless it's blatantly rigged, substantial public support will be there). A revolution is flipping a coin that lands on the side most effectively able to concentrate violence. Sometimes that's achieved by overwhelming public support, but if your "revolution" is a military coup, it doesn't need many people to be on side at all.
Re:Bound to Fail: The Rise and Fall of the Liberal Internati...
by throwawaygal7 on Friday January 07, 2022 @09:34AM
(#29839531)
Mao won the Civil War only after getting US backing during WW2, and allowing the nationalists to do the bulk of the fight againsg the Japanese while gathering his strength.
The real question is what happens once democracy has taken hold.