Why No OCaml

Posted by mathgladiator on Sunday September 11, 2011 @12:51AM
from the blog.mathgladiator.com dept.

( 4 comments | 10 points | on HN )

Re:Why No OCaml by dasil003 on Sunday September 11, 2011 @02:17AM (#2983337)

Is Java more maintainable than terser, more advanced languages with better abstractions? The possibility that this may be true terrifies me.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Why No OCaml by wnight on Sunday September 11, 2011 @04:59AM (#2983514)

In terms of lines-of-code "maintained" per day, yes. In terms of actual constructs debugged, I doubt it.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Why No OCaml by kunjaan on Sunday September 11, 2011 @01:19AM (#2983276)

Not sure if trolling..

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Why No OCaml by mobileman on Sunday September 11, 2011 @01:24AM (#2983282)

I don't think so; he seems bitter about the state of the OCaml community and the ability to build companies with it that has maintainable code.

[ Parent | on HN ]