It is important to recognize that many of the ideas weren't necessarily bad at the time, they were just 100% optimized for moving fast and capturing eyeballs. Now Pets.com came back as Chewy.com and Kosmo came back as Instacart.
Most of the winners (assuming there are some) simply don't exist yet. There may be some Amazon/Googles in there - if so, they are getting some press but aren't necessarily winning the hardest right now but are building the hardest for tomorrow.
For crypto, it’s not like there is a cool use case hampered by a lack of support infrastructure, there just is no cool use case (yet).
Like what’s version 2.0 of Solana look like? Is it a consumer transaction network? Is it a web3 thing? What’s the unlock that gets us there? Are we just applying the wrong metaphors to the wrong technology because we are hopeful that there will be “another Internet” that our generation can profit from?
What did CueCat come back as?
;-)
Hustle mindset got us here, dunno if it gets us out.
At least...it's working so far.
Crypto.com was founded in 2016, FTX in 2018, Coinbase in 2012, Gemini in 2014, Binance in 2017.
"The Internet succeeded because it skewed capitalism - the first or richest project didn't necessarily win, the most user friendly project usually did."
Compare that to crypto: The largest project by far is the first, companies like crypto.com can just spend billions of dollars on marketing to become a leading exchange, and users still don't really reap tangible benefits from crypto (other than asset appreciation and edge use-cases).
It's like everyone looked to the early internet and ignored everything good about it other than the equity appreciation (probably b/c that is exactly what crypto is right now)