News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Tauri – Electron alternative written in Rust by YPPH on Wednesday January 05, 2022 @07:49AM (#29808287)
Does the Chrome engine, embedded within Electron, contain any Chrome features which one could legitimately call into question (such as sync)?

If not, what's wrong with it "spread[ing]" everywhere?

It's hardly lazy dev work. It's a pragmatic approach to developing cross platform apps quickly. Apps that, it might be added, don't have a horrendous UI, which is common with other frameworks.

Re:Tauri – Electron alternative written in Rust by niyaven on Wednesday January 05, 2022 @07:57AM (#29808335)
> If not, what's wrong with it "spread[ing]" everywhere?

Because then it's a monopoly. I'm taking shortcuts but having a single browser engine controlled by a single company means that you rely on that company to define what is tomorrow's web like.

Re:Tauri – Electron alternative written in Rust by bredren on Wednesday January 05, 2022 @10:57AM (#29810534)
Without this kind of thing happening at times, we might still be using Flash.
Re:Tauri – Electron alternative written in Rust by kbelder on Wednesday January 05, 2022 @12:42PM (#29812184)
Electron feels to me a lot like stand-alone flash apps used to feel.

I get that same feeling when I open an program using it; kind of a 'oh...' slight disappointment. I get that it makes sense sometimes for a developer to sacrifice performance and size for ease of development... but as a user, it feels like a loss, a sign the developer will be taking too many shortcuts, or that I just won't like their general design philosophy.

Re:Tauri – Electron alternative written in Rust by fabianhjr on Wednesday January 05, 2022 @11:38AM (#29811204)
Yeah, it had nothing to do with work on open standards like HTML5 and CSS3. (And WebGL for more advanced rendering needs) /s