Re:Copyright doesn't need 95 years to get the job done
by CRConrad on Tuesday January 04, 2022 @02:22PM
(#29798865)
>> I think this misses the point that parent is making
> I don’t, it’s important to clearly differentiate between patents and copyrights
Why?
The distinction seems quite artificial to me -- "intellectual property" is "intellectual property", isn't it? -- so IMO its proponents own the burden of justifying it.
> I don’t, it’s important to clearly differentiate between patents and copyrights
Why?
The distinction seems quite artificial to me -- "intellectual property" is "intellectual property", isn't it? -- so IMO its proponents own the burden of justifying it.