News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Elizabeth Holmes found guilty by anthony_romeo on Tuesday January 04, 2022 @11:20AM (#29796500)
My main point from above:

> I do get frustrated seeing these sorts of vague cynical quips levying *specific* accusations based more upon a gut plausibility of a scenario rather than a clear outline of information.

Re:Elizabeth Holmes found guilty by elzbardico on Tuesday January 04, 2022 @04:21PM (#29800709)
We got it and I couldn’t possibly agree more if you didn’t obnoxiously cut and pasted the same criticism for every subsequent message that failed to satisfy your standards. Sometimes people don’t get our point, so we just move on
Re:Elizabeth Holmes found guilty by anthony_romeo on Wednesday January 05, 2022 @09:39AM (#29809483)
Understood. I admittedly got slightly miffed when the first few replies I received in a short time were conjecture.

As an aside, one reply had mentioned plausible deniability… perhaps ‘plausible accusability’ also exists, wherein any hypothetical crime one can imagine is presumed to have factually occurred unless 100% disproven.