> The disaster isn't that there is no access to the pool. The issue is that they're trying to spite the poors and shame them, because they're trying to prevent them from moving in.

That’s really not true though. The facilities beyond the “poor doors” aren’t any different from how most normal people live, they’re just right next to luxury accommodation for rich people. The contrast is obviously more apparent, but the developers aren’t doing anything to screw over the poors (what’d be the point?).

> If we really wanted, the government could build appartements of better quality and sell them at same price, AND make a profit on it.

Of course, but the politicians would rather virtue signal about “poor doors” than actually solve problems.