News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Elizabeth Holmes found guilty by shard on Tuesday January 04, 2022 @06:21AM (#29793646)
> a simpler machine could have been built

That's the definition of over-engineering: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Overengineering

Re:Elizabeth Holmes found guilty by bumby on Tuesday January 04, 2022 @09:25AM (#29795044)
You’re right about the colloquial definition but I think the OP is more on point about the crux of the issue. Most physical world engineering applications are about the skill of stripping away as much as possible and still getting the job done. It’s an exercise of working within constraints. “Over-engineering” is ignoring those constraints.
Re:Elizabeth Holmes found guilty by zerocrates on Tuesday January 04, 2022 @07:54PM (#29803373)
"Perfection is achieved not when there is nothing more to add, but when there is nothing left to take away. Now please take away this overpriced juicer."
Re:Elizabeth Holmes found guilty by peteradio on Tuesday January 04, 2022 @08:47AM (#29794648)
Definition written by management who can't tell good from bad. Ya see too many engineers got involved I reckon, should done what I told em, keep it simple fellas.