> You're making the assumption that Holmes wronged "commoners" with malicious intent.
Nope. I take from the text that prosecutors-and-or-law-itself defend the interests of super rich better than the interests/well-being of commoners.
> I would be very careful before jumping to conclusions and asserting with high confidence that the court verdict is flawed.
Good for you. I'm not saying it is flawed, neither am I passing judgement on who's guilty... I'm saying it seems the whole system is favoring the some over others.
1. you have incredible insight into the inner workings of the company. 2. you're joining an online pitchforking mob.
As much as I rejoice seeing a Silicon Valley poster child be exposed as a phony and a fraud, I would be very careful before jumping to conclusions and asserting with high confidence that the court verdict is flawed.