Re:Lab Leak 2.0?
by kelnos on Tuesday January 04, 2022 @04:49AM
(#29793085)
Agreed on this. I read the article before looking at comments (now 8-9 hours after it was posted), and thought "hmm, ok, I'm skeptical, but these seem to be pretty strong arguments". I was pleased to come here to the comments to find strong counter-arguments, many of which are things I wouldn't have considered due to lack of expertise here. So I'm glad it got enough votes and stuck around long enough for serious discussion.
(For the record, I still do believe the various lab-leak theories have legs, and should be discussed and investigated, even if this particular article ends up being unconvincing.)
(For the record, I still do believe the various lab-leak theories have legs, and should be discussed and investigated, even if this particular article ends up being unconvincing.)