News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Elizabeth Holmes found guilty by codeflo on Tuesday January 04, 2022 @04:46AM (#29793059)
Isn’t Al Capone’s tax evasion conviction usually mentioned as a bit of a joke? I don’t see how anyone can cite it as an example of the system working perfectly fine.

Ignoring for a moment that this was in a very different era, to me, there are only two possible conclusions from this:

(a) The conviction was legitimate. This means that if only he had been a bit more thorough about laundering his money, he’d have gotten away with organized murder.

(b) The conviction was ultimately politically motivated, because it became a public embarrassment that he couldn’t be convicted of anything. But if the state really wants to get rid of someone, a prosecutor will find a way, so they did.

And I seriously don’t know which possibility is more frightening.

Re:Elizabeth Holmes found guilty by himinlomax on Tuesday January 04, 2022 @04:57AM (#29793143)
Re:Elizabeth Holmes found guilty by notch656a on Tuesday January 04, 2022 @01:11PM (#29797889)
(b) is far more terrifying. I'd rather 1000 murderers get away than a single case of a prosecutor have that kind of discretionary power to fuck over essentially anyone just for selective enforcement. The law should be applied equally.
Re:Elizabeth Holmes found guilty by afterburner on Wednesday January 05, 2022 @03:31AM (#29806545)
You think the state imprisoning a crime boss is frightening?