Re:The Coverage of Theranos Is Utter Bullshit (2015)
by jjeaff on Saturday January 01, 2022 @11:21PM
(#29765793)
I see no evidence that the author read the WSJ article he tried to refute. Because he provided zero refutation to any of the specific facts reported. It's just sort of, that article said she was bad, but I don't think so.
Think about how many people's medical care was affected by her. Even if 10% of the results were wrong, that's 100,000 results.
Nature does a decent job of summing up the mess: https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-018-05149-2