Re:EU drafts plan to label gas and nuclear investments as green
by bpodgursky on Saturday January 01, 2022 @09:58PM
(#29765329)
> when building, maintenance and decomissioning
OK, but the same applies to wind turbines. I don't see a lot of Teslas hauling wind turbines down I-80. Let's not set up double standards just for nuclear.
Re:EU drafts plan to label gas and nuclear investments as green
by AQuantized on Saturday January 01, 2022 @10:05PM
(#29765369)
There's already large contemporary investment in wind and solar relative to the past, not quite the same for nuclear. A lot of processes are inherited from very old projects back in its heyday.
Re:EU drafts plan to label gas and nuclear investments as green
by AQuantized on Saturday January 01, 2022 @09:29PM
(#29765141)
Also owing consideration is the many advances to those processes that could occur with more substantial investment in nuclear power.
However the primary benefit to nuclear, beyond its acceptable carbon emissions, is that functioning as a base load removes a lot of the difficultly with building enough battery infrastructure to enable solar power to power peak load and through the night. This is particularly the case for service based economies whose peak load is often after dark.
Re:EU drafts plan to label gas and nuclear investments as green
by colechristensen on Saturday January 01, 2022 @09:46PM
(#29765257)
One nice thing about solar is the economics of making the night shift more expensive and less common.
There seems to be quiet bimodal distribution of CO2e estimates for carbon. Some are like 5 other >100 in the same unit.
[1] https://web.stanford.edu/group/efmh/jacobson/Articles/I/Nucl...