Isn't this exactly how backups should work? Do you really want Apple deciding which settings/data are not important to you?
Instead of asking you to lose all your data as a workaround to a bad bug, they should actually fix that bug properly, so that it's no longer a bug.
Likely the same with the bug described in this story - if someone ends up affected by it, they're basically pooched: they can't do any more new backups, and likely if they do restore from a previous backup where data exists that triggers this, they're just going to get into that same loop of problems.
And because it's not a "high severity" (RCE) bug, it's likely never really going to get fixed as there are "workarounds for it" (read: wipe/setup the device and omit your data) or "other mitigations implemented already (previous versions of the OS be damned!)" as noted in the story.
I do expect "the config/setup that would trigger a battery drain in <iOS X" to be restored, but Apple can always fix iOS so that the same config/setup won't break >=iOS X.
One example is the cellular-data draining bug[1]. The only "solution" for this is to wipe your device, and set it up again, without restoring any backups, at all. Which makes the whole point of backups of the device totally pointless.
For a company that spent $6B+ on a (now mostly empty) campus, you'd think they could spare a few $million into proper QA/Testing.
[1] https://mjtsai.com/blog/2019/07/26/broken-ios-cellular-data-...