Re:Fouling Out and Moving On (re: Notifo Shutdown)
by cperciva on Thursday September 08, 2011 @07:53PM
(#2976176)
That may be a strike against being a single founder, but it seems like a strike in favour of single-founder startups: Because they don't have "talent acquisition" as an exit option, they're more likely to avoid dying.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Fouling Out and Moving On (re: Notifo Shutdown)
by rdl on Friday September 09, 2011 @03:41AM
(#2977293)
More likely to run to $0 and shut down entirely, vs. a talent acquisition (which always looks better than a shut down, and has a chance of returning a tiny bit of capital to angels who invested early)?
Sounds like another point in favor of multi-founder startups. I wouldn't consider even a talent acquisition to be "dying" if the founders end up happy about it.