News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Problem with Vanity TLDs (2011) by acheron on Saturday January 01, 2022 @01:30PM (#29761126)
I’m never going to remember a domain with a silly tld. I don’t necessarily think badly of the company when I see a link to one (I mostly think “fuck you ICANN”) but it is anti-memorable.
Re:The Problem with Vanity TLDs (2011) by sofixa on Saturday January 01, 2022 @01:57PM (#29761416)
Oh please. A Cloud Guru's acloud.guru is awesome and easy to remember, and there are probably tons of other examples.
Re:The Problem with Vanity TLDs (2011) by dqv on Saturday January 01, 2022 @02:13PM (#29761584)
And a lot of the .com domain space is polluted either with people sitting on domains and wanting to sell them for thousands or just leaving it unregisterable. So you have this choice of either creating a really long .com, or a shorter .other

Granted, the domain name system is not ideal, but adding new TLDs, however long, is a better solution than dealing with having to name your company so you can get a .com that matches it.

Re:The Problem with Vanity TLDs (2011) by marc_io on Saturday January 01, 2022 @02:10PM (#29761553)
Notion.so is another example. The gTLD in this case could even be considered part or the brand, as notion.com points to it.
Re:The Problem with Vanity TLDs (2011) by easrng on Saturday January 01, 2022 @02:17PM (#29761634)
.so is a ccTLD, not a gTLD.
Re:The Problem with Vanity TLDs (2011) by fivea on Saturday January 01, 2022 @08:30PM (#29764807)
> I’m never going to remember a domain with a silly tld.

I doubt this assertion is grounded in reality. Sites that resort to puns from cc TLDs like lobste.rs don't suffer from name recognition problems, and no one ever had any problem remembering twitch.tv.