News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Reporter may be prosecuted for using “view source” by chii on Friday December 31, 2021 @05:55AM (#29746798)
To differentiate between murder and manslaughter (say, due to negligence), the idea of intent (or state of mind) is taken into account.
Re:Reporter may be prosecuted for using “view source” by loopz on Friday December 31, 2021 @06:26AM (#29747010)
There is nothing illegal about reading what was sent to you though.
Re:Reporter may be prosecuted for using “view source” by chii on Saturday January 01, 2022 @01:49AM (#29756185)
If the data was sent as part of normal operation, then yes, it should be fine. But the post above is talking about incrementing an ID in a query, or inject SQL.

The intent of the person doing the incrementing id, or sql injection, is very much required to be taken in to consideration when considering whether it is an illegal act of computer trespass.

Re:Reporter may be prosecuted for using “view source” by loopz on Saturday January 01, 2022 @05:58AM (#29757336)
Anyone can increment an ID or try to inject sql. 30 years of security practices shows white/grey hat hacking to be a good thing, and should be expected. GDPR even makes poor security finable. Cyberdefence also requires more security expertise, which can only be had from real experience.

"It's fine when the good guys do it", is poor lawmaking. So intent is hard to prove, and not very practical. It also put the blame on the accused, having to prove their innocence.

I find it interesting that people equate information breaches with murder.