News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Table Oriented Programming (2002) by rak1507 on Thursday December 30, 2021 @02:21PM (#29740333)
Why is it still used then? Are there just no good alternatives? Or legacy reasons?
Re:Table Oriented Programming (2002) by beagle3 on Thursday December 30, 2021 @03:36PM (#29741141)
On the things it does well - being a memory mapped column store, it hardly had any competition a few years ago (clickhouse might be getting there these days, perhaps)

And if your fluent in K, one-of scripts and queries are significantly shorter and easier to get right.

But it is not good as a general purpose language in a commercial setting - not because of the language itself which is fine if a bit spartan - but because it is hard to find people who are willing and able to work with it.

Much like its predecessor APL, it’s a tool for thought more than a tool for implementation.

Re:Table Oriented Programming (2002) by tluyben2 on Friday December 31, 2021 @03:34AM (#29746066)
I think many people would work in it, but the job market for it is limited and driven by who knows who as far as I noticed. I hope Shakti will make things better: so far it's nice and definitely it's pricepoint is a lot better. Not sure where it will go.
Re:Table Oriented Programming (2002) by rak1507 on Friday December 31, 2021 @10:31AM (#29748885)
How do you know the price point is better? It's not on the website. Are you a customer?
Re:Table Oriented Programming (2002) by rak1507 on Thursday December 30, 2021 @08:03PM (#29743647)
Yeah I personally really like array langs so I was just wondering why other people don't.