I love when someone uses the label "This is misinformation" but then also has to rely on that they're judgement that it is misinformation is more accurate than yours. Well what makes that true? Suddenly you are qualified to judge that but not us? Well what makes that the case? Is it you being on the side of the majority?

If it's scientific credentials and experience that qualifies you, then there are also just as many qualified people with credentials that disagree (on the side of your so-called "misinformation" so ultimately what this has come down to is that any information you disagree with has been labeled "misinformation" or neither you nor the other person is qualified to judge what is misinformation or not and all you ever can trust is information that comes from a Big Govt organization or CDC/WHO like group). At which case, then why critically think at all and have any discussion whatsoever?

How do you know it's misinformation? Or are you just taking someone elses word for it?

Like what?

Do you have an MD and/or a background in developing mRNA vaccines?