News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Feds to take over Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac by gills on Sunday September 07, 2008 @01:51AM (#297323)
The prospectus for every bond issued by these agencies explicitly states that it is not guaranteed by the United States.

The housing market does not need Fannie and Freddie. What it needs is a stable provider of liquidity (a broker for the secondary mortgage market). Let Fannie and Freddie fail, and simultaneously introduce an explicitly-backstopped liquidity mechanism/agency.

Re:Feds to take over Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac by misterbwong on Sunday September 07, 2008 @02:19PM (#297622)
While this sounds good in theory, I get the feeling this is one of those easier-said-than-done situations. Even if there was a replacement liquidity provider ready to replace the two firms, letting them fail would cause a huge amount of stress for the market.
Re:Feds to take over Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac by etal on Sunday September 07, 2008 @11:25AM (#297528)
True. It's unclear exactly how the federal government "implicitly" backed Fannie and Freddie, besides occasional congressional meddling and the companies' history as GSEs, but other financial agencies and investors treated them as if they knew the government would step in if there was a problem -- and it turns out they were right.