Sorry, I didn't put it in the example. You have all the numbers in real-time on the link.

My point was more to show that even you have a huge quantity of renewable, that doesn't means that is the correct path to go CO2 wise. Except if you accept that your society adapt itself to a non planned and highly variable electricity production.

Partial data is equal to false data when you misrepresent it like that. I'm also pro nuclear power, but coal and gas are too big factor to ignore.

Just edited it ;)