Re:Ask HN: Why doesn't YC list compensation for their own op...
by unethical_ban on Wednesday December 29, 2021 @02:10AM
(#29722651)
Summary once again, because I think you're going in a roundabout way.
You assume:
a) Companies will by necessity pay people doing ostensibly the same thing different amounts of money
b) People do not necessarily wish for their salary to be made public
c) Making a salary range requires the lower and upper bound to be equidistant from the expected starting pay
d) Making too narrow a salary range would therefore reveal pay, in contradiction to b).
Therefore, it is a necessity of employees' desired privacy and employers' ability to advertise the lowest, er, "most competitive" wage possible for the company to have a wide salary range.
EDIT to add: I think your argument still falls a little flat, because salary ranges should still be accurate. "We would consider hiring someone with slightly less resume experience for the bottom range, we would hire a rockstar demigod at the highend, and just what we're looking for somewhere around the middle".
You assume:
a) Companies will by necessity pay people doing ostensibly the same thing different amounts of money
b) People do not necessarily wish for their salary to be made public
c) Making a salary range requires the lower and upper bound to be equidistant from the expected starting pay
d) Making too narrow a salary range would therefore reveal pay, in contradiction to b).
Therefore, it is a necessity of employees' desired privacy and employers' ability to advertise the lowest, er, "most competitive" wage possible for the company to have a wide salary range.
EDIT to add: I think your argument still falls a little flat, because salary ranges should still be accurate. "We would consider hiring someone with slightly less resume experience for the bottom range, we would hire a rockstar demigod at the highend, and just what we're looking for somewhere around the middle".