Re:FBI document shows what data can be obtained from encrypt...
by maqp on Tuesday December 28, 2021 @10:57AM
(#29714896)
It's also the case doing that securely required pushing the boundaries of modern cryptographic protocols. Telegram's protocol graphs are novices' doodles compared to Signal's group encryption stuff formally described here: https://signal.org/blog/pdfs/signal_private_group_system.pdf
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:FBI document shows what data can be obtained from encrypt...
by hanniabu on Tuesday December 28, 2021 @01:12PM
(#29716251)
On the other hand Signal has made a lot of questionable choices (such as adding a crypto payment that was just a money grab) that it has made me lost trust in the team and their motives. I no longer trust their build images and even if you build your own you have no idea what software the person you're talking to is running.
Re:FBI document shows what data can be obtained from encrypt...
by maqp on Tuesday December 28, 2021 @03:51PM
(#29717992)
Sure, you do you. Personally I haven't seen anyone in e.g. the major infosec expert bubble abandon Signal for introducing mobilecoin. It's an opt-in feature, it doesn't make the message side security code harder to audit, and it's not like Moxie isn't painstakingly engineering everything to be secure from the get-go. I haven't once been disappointed in a new feature. OTOH consider Telegram that adds group video calls that nobody asked for: is it E2EE? Nope. Another security disparity to make explaining and understanding its security even more nightmarish.