Re:Could housing be cheaper and better if we stop building s...
by tzs on Friday December 24, 2021 @11:59PM
(#29680565)
They use scissor stairs. That's two stairways in one stairwell, with the stairways winding around each other. They count as two exit stairways if (1) the stairways are enclosed in and separated from each other by masonry or masonry equivalent construction having at least a 2 hour fire resistance rating, and (2) the exit doors are 15 ft or more apart.
While they might work as far as providing residents two routes out in an emergency, they do present challenges to firefighters [1]:
> Jack J. Murphy, a former firefighter, fire marshal, and current chairman of the New York City High-Rise Fire Safety Directors Association, has inspected some of these buildings and says they present unique challenges for firefighters. For one, the buildings’ small footprints mean very narrow scissor stairwells that can have five or more turns between floors. “What would that do to my hose stretch?” Murphy said. The compact size also means tight quarters for operation and medical staging in an emergency.
[1] https://www.nfpa.org/News-and-Research/Publications-and-medi...
Re:Could housing be cheaper and better if we stop building s...
by kurthr on Saturday December 25, 2021 @02:48PM
(#29686343)
Interesting, can't imagine going down over 1000ft of stairs without sliding on my ass, much less going up with a fire hose in heavy gear.
And since they're really financial instruments, the buildings are still only half full!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wehsz38P74g