Entire website in a single HTML file

Re:Entire website in a single HTML file by adabaed on Friday December 24, 2021 @01:38AM (#29670973)

Depends of what a website is for you.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Entire website in a single HTML file by dmitriid on Friday December 24, 2021 @02:48AM (#29671351)

The same it is for everyone since the beginning of WWW: a static page with images. The web is uniquely unsuitable for anything else.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Entire website in a single HTML file by cutler on Friday December 24, 2021 @03:54AM (#29671734)

So forget e-commerce? Amazon didn't do too badly and CGI was hot on the heels of HTML so I think "everyone" is a little exaggerated.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Entire website in a single HTML file by dmitriid on Friday December 24, 2021 @04:00AM (#29671781)

> So forget e-commerce?

Says (s)he and immediately follows up with

> Amazon didn't do too badly

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Entire website in a single HTML file by cutler on Friday December 24, 2021 @09:20PM (#29679744)

My point is that the WWW was a lot more than static HTML and CSS pretty soon after its inception.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Entire website in a single HTML file by dmitriid on Saturday December 25, 2021 @02:51AM (#29681347)

You're confusing displaying different information at different URLs with being "more than static HTML and CSS".

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Entire website in a single HTML file by TomGullen on Friday December 24, 2021 @06:18AM (#29672662)

This is a very old fashioned point of view I’m afraid, things have moved on.

[ Parent | on HN ]

[dead]

Re:Entire website in a single HTML file by adabaed on Friday December 24, 2021 @06:23PM (#29678760)

I know enough to don't feel the need to demonstrate a random guy in a forum that I know more about a topic.

[ Parent | on HN ]