News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Ultrabook: Intel's $300 million plan to beat Apple at its... by Triumvark on Tuesday September 06, 2011 @07:24AM (#2965112)
> Only Apple seems willing or able to put the consumer first.

Ironically, the story began with a note on how Apple puts the UK consumer last.

Re:Ultrabook: Intel's $300 million plan to beat Apple at its... by gmac on Tuesday September 06, 2011 @08:44AM (#2965311)
Yeah -- but one which I totally don't buy. It takes me all of 2 minutes to adjust to the transposed @ and " characters and back again, and I'd never even noticed the difference with Return before now. Feels like the author's just setting up a straw man to make the lack of a non-Apple ultraportable seem like it matters.
Re:Ultrabook: Intel's $300 million plan to beat Apple at its... by eitally on Tuesday September 06, 2011 @10:57AM (#2965789)
Except that your perception of Apple putting the consumer first is just an indicator of how well they've hidden the fact that they're actually putting Apple first. Steve & Jony are designers first and they try their hardest never to cut corners. Steve & Tim are businessmen out to make a buck or a billion, too. It just so happened that the confluence of their design and business processes lead to a highly profitable supply chain.
Re:Ultrabook: Intel's $300 million plan to beat Apple at its... by Triumvark on Monday September 12, 2011 @07:57AM (#2986814)
> your perception of Apple putting the consumer first

Not my perception. See the second line of my above comment.