News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Ultrabook: Intel's $300 million plan to beat Apple at its own game. Parent comment

Re:Ultrabook: Intel's $300 million plan to beat Apple at its... by pmjordan on Tuesday September 06, 2011 @06:09AM (#2964939)
Intel apparently is still an ARM licensee: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XScale#Sale_of_PXA_processor_li...

I'm guessing the licensing fees are peanuts to Intel and probably come with patent indemnification.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Ultrabook: Intel's $300 million plan to beat Apple at its... by ansy on Tuesday September 06, 2011 @09:33AM (#2965514)
Apparently ARM does list Intel as a license holder of the ARM11 and ARM7 (i.e. classic) designs. It is not listed, though, as a licensor of new Cortex designs. [1]

Note that an ARM license has both an up front fee and a per unit royalty. Without Xscale, Intel's royalty fees would be zero meaning as you say it is free to maintain going forward. I can only guess why the license didn't go with Xscale, but I see Marvell is only listed as an ARM9 license holder so maybe it just didn't want the ARM7 and ARM11 licenses.

Perhaps, too, there are other complications that come with transferring an ARM license in the contract language or patent arrangements.

[1] http://www.arm.com/products/processors/licensees.php

[ Parent | on HN ]