Re:Microsoft Teams: 1 feature, 4 vulnerabilities
by detaro on Wednesday December 22, 2021 @06:29AM
(#29647946)
The pattern of stories indicated that it was a thing that got attention, so people went digging for whatever they could find and push. You don't need a conspiracy for something to get way more attention than others.
Re:Microsoft Teams: 1 feature, 4 vulnerabilities
by newjersey on Wednesday December 22, 2021 @06:51AM
(#29648091)
I am not trying to say Microsoft did anything unlawful. However, I am suspicious that these events in 2020 were coordinated.
I remember we knew about Zoom vulnerabilities in 2018 as well but I rarely used video conferencing and definitely not for "daily stand ups" however, I wouldn't discount Microsoft tried its best to "educate" reporters.
Re:Microsoft Teams: 1 feature, 4 vulnerabilities
by spoonjim on Wednesday December 22, 2021 @10:51AM
(#29650880)
Megacorps feeding stories to journalists is not a “conspiracy theory.” It isn’t even a secret!
Re:Microsoft Teams: 1 feature, 4 vulnerabilities
by luckylion on Wednesday December 22, 2021 @07:50AM
(#29648571)
Would they drip-feed what they found though? Sounds like you need some form of coordination for that at least.
Re:Microsoft Teams: 1 feature, 4 vulnerabilities
by detaro on Wednesday December 22, 2021 @02:08PM
(#29653648)
The "drip-feed" of people finding things not all at the same time, and basing their search on previous findings?
Re:Microsoft Teams: 1 feature, 4 vulnerabilities
by kjellsbells on Thursday December 23, 2021 @01:22PM
(#29664720)
No conspiracy required, just change "party" to "parties" and "someone" to plural "people".
Zoom went from interesting tool to de facto worldwide standard in about two months. I'm pretty sure that in the offices of Microsoft, webex, goto meeting etc there was a collective WTF from leadership and people were instructed to find weaknesses. It doesn't follow that there was collusion or an evil conspiracy.
I figured that it was done by a big party that had a trusted relationship with tech journalists because they bigged up vulnerabilities that were relatively minor to journalists who didnt seem to be aware of it.
It's possible it wasnt Microsoft but the pattern of stories indicated Zoom was a public relations target of someone who freaked out after seeing how fast they were growing and MS certainly took full advantage.