News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Non-Fungible Olive Gardens. Parent comment

Re:Non-Fungible Olive Gardens by beckman466 on Tuesday December 21, 2021 @07:18PM (#29643856)
famed Canadian business consultant Nathan Fielder has shown us how we can protect ourselves when critiquing big corporations by using an important tool: parody law.

an example: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y4KrdjAPohc

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Non-Fungible Olive Gardens by skinnymuch on Tuesday December 21, 2021 @07:53PM (#29644154)
I was happy to see someone else bring up Nathan. I didn’t even realize how you described him the first read through. Ah yes the business consultant who got okay grades at an okay Canadian college.

Nathan Fielder does indeed have a status as a parody artist of course. A family member is working for his new show. Says it seems way crazier than Nathan For You.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Non-Fungible Olive Gardens by beckman466 on Wednesday December 22, 2021 @12:13AM (#29645814)
> A family member is working for his new show. Says it seems way crazier than Nathan For You.

exciting! glad he’s working on new stuff!

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Non-Fungible Olive Gardens by mike00632 on Tuesday December 21, 2021 @08:01PM (#29644215)
What is the critique of Olive Garden here?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Non-Fungible Olive Gardens by beckman466 on Tuesday December 21, 2021 @09:26PM (#29644875)
i can't tell if you're willfully misinterpreting or not.

to answer your question: this whole NFT thing is a scam pushed by the propertied class/corporations.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Non-Fungible Olive Gardens by mike00632 on Sunday January 02, 2022 @08:32PM (#29776278)
The question was, "What is the critique of Olive Garden here?"

What you wrote is not an answer to that question. This question was supposed to make you doubt that a use of Olive Garden's copyright (which requires a critique of Olive Garden to be fair use) might not legally fall under fair use.

[ Parent | on HN ]