Re:RCE in Visual Studio Code's Remote WSL for Fun and Negati...
by throw10920 on Tuesday December 21, 2021 @11:48AM
(#29639170)
Some parts of VSCode are MIT Licensed - not all of it, and in particular, parts of the standard VSCode that almost everybody downloads are straight-up proprietary, per the article[1].
[1] https://parsiya.net/blog/2021-12-20-rce-in-visual-studio-cod...
Re:RCE in Visual Studio Code's Remote WSL for Fun and Negati...
by jodrellblank on Tuesday December 21, 2021 @03:09PM
(#29641497)
> "Some parts of VSCode are MIT Licensed - not all of it"
The source code, the editor are. This is like Oracle releasing a proprietary plugin for EMACS and distributing it on Oracle Linux, and someone saying "this is bad, we need FOSS editors!". That wouldn't make EMACS not-FOSS.
(Is it trolling of me to point out that of course the thing people actually want is not the FOSS bit? There are dozens of editors, people want features not ideology)
Arguably the MIT license gives you more Freedom than the GPL'd Linux kernel or GNU utilities. Trying to draw a distinction between "evil user-unfriendly Microsoft stuff" and "Holy Saviour FOSS" is not meaningful anymore.