News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:How are Rome's monuments still standing? by moosedev on Monday December 20, 2021 @09:29PM (#29633129)
Native speaker (Brit in USA) here. Either one is fine, although they have subtle differences in meaning and implication (to me) in this context.

The first thing that struck me before I gave this any real thought is that "How" here connotes a little incredulity or even amazement (to me). There's an implied, rhetorical sense of unlikelihood of the fact. ("How are Rome's monuments still standing?! Shouldn't they have fallen down by now?")

"How" also implies (to me) that we seek an explanation of processes, means, techniques, or methods. It invites an answer that's somehow more dynamic and more detailed. "Why" is asking "for what reason(s)?" The "Why" version of the question feels more direct, but the answer space is broader and more abstract. "How" feels, forgive me, more concrete here than "Why" :)

How -> explain the processes, techniques, or workings. Why -> explain the reasons/causes. Obviously, there's overlap there, and the distinction is subtle, so perhaps some of this is only in my head :)

I found http://www.differencebetween.net/language/grammar-language/d... which seems to half-agree.

Re:How are Rome's monuments still standing? by bennysomething on Tuesday December 21, 2021 @02:12AM (#29634837)
Interesting!

It's got even more confusing since I moved to Scotland!

https://www.google.com/search?q=how%20vs%20why%20scotland&ie...

(I'm a native English speaker too,and would have defaulted to why, how is jarring to me, but I notice myself saying more and more)