News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Nicholas Taleb: The Great Bank Robbery by exit on Monday September 05, 2011 @02:04AM (#2961335)
if bank executives don't consume a smaller portion of their income than anyone else, it follows that the best form of keynesian stimulus is tax cuts for those executives?
Re:Nicholas Taleb: The Great Bank Robbery by rvkennedy on Monday September 05, 2011 @02:09AM (#2961342)
But they do. Because unlike most people, bank executives don't spend most of what they earn on housing, clothing and feeding their families. Even in the best of times, the rich spend less of their income than the others. Right now, they're spending even less than usual, particularly in terms of investment, because of the bleak economic outlook.
Re:Nicholas Taleb: The Great Bank Robbery by exit on Monday September 05, 2011 @03:26AM (#2961487)
yes. i agree. i don't follow the argument i was reply to at all.
Re:Nicholas Taleb: The Great Bank Robbery by yummyfajitas on Monday September 05, 2011 @02:44AM (#2961414)
The purpose of Keynesian stimulus is to stimulate spending. Most proponents of Keynesian policies oppose directing stimulus to the rich people on the theory that rich people spend the smallest fraction of their income (i.e., they save the most).
Re:Nicholas Taleb: The Great Bank Robbery by exit on Monday September 05, 2011 @03:24AM (#2961483)
i don't see how that shows that "the best" form of stimulus would be to lower their taxes.
Re:Nicholas Taleb: The Great Bank Robbery by danssig on Monday September 05, 2011 @08:55AM (#2962058)
He's saying that if the rich are spending more of their money in the economy then we should be giving them even more tax breaks so they could spend even more in the economy.

Probably the reason you didn't get what he meant was because it's utterly nonsensical.