News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:An NFT without a blockchain by fwip on Saturday December 18, 2021 @06:36PM (#29609812)
There's no reason for that Reddit thing to be an NFT. Twitter or Discord could simply integrate w/ Reddit API and pull that shit up.
Re:An NFT without a blockchain by eightysixfour on Saturday December 18, 2021 @10:01PM (#29610939)
Or the blockchain is the API, which is public, and requires only a single integration point for everyone.
Re:An NFT without a blockchain by hiq on Sunday December 19, 2021 @06:50AM (#29613217)
> Or the blockchain is the API, which is public, and requires only a single integration point for everyone.

You don't need a blockchain for interoperability, neither does it enforce interoperability.

Re:An NFT without a blockchain by eightysixfour on Sunday December 19, 2021 @10:28AM (#29614653)
You do not NEED it, but it can enable it. In the situation above the benefit is you, the recipient, are never again dependent on Reddit to validate that award for you. As long as the blockchain continues to exit, you, the wallet owner, maintain “ownership” over that award.

Considering how much most HN users rail against centralized services and things others not to turn stuff off, it seems like the value is obvious to me.

Re:An NFT without a blockchain by hiq on Sunday December 19, 2021 @11:22AM (#29615133)
> You do not NEED it, but it can enable it.

How so? Why is it any better than a public API?

> In the situation above the benefit is you, the recipient, are never again dependent on Reddit to validate that award for you.

You're assuming that Reddit would create an NFT that doesn't grant them any special power. Why would they do that? Why wouldn't they create a blockchain NFT with an admin address that they own and which can do pretty much anything?

> Considering how much most HN users rail against centralized services and things others not to turn stuff off, it seems like the value is obvious to me.

You can be centralized on a blockchain though, e.g. using an admin address as I described.

Re:An NFT without a blockchain by acdha on Sunday December 19, 2021 @12:24PM (#29615922)
> How so? Why is it any better than a public API?

Specifically in that using my API won't require you to pay him money. There are other reasons they'll claim but once you dig through the chaff that's what it comes down to.

Re:An NFT without a blockchain by 3371 on Sunday December 19, 2021 @11:05PM (#29621469)
Massive global adopted blockchains will indeed provide additional interoperability, thought there's none now.

Just consider it something like decoupling in coding but for the whole internet.

Re:An NFT without a blockchain by hiq on Monday December 20, 2021 @01:56AM (#29622148)
Globally adopted standards provide additional interoperability. What does this have to do with blockchain technologies?
Re:An NFT without a blockchain by 3371 on Wednesday December 22, 2021 @07:57AM (#29648665)
Yeah, I agree it does not have to be blockchain, any "consistently online" and widely adopted thing will do.
Re:An NFT without a blockchain by lifeformed on Saturday December 18, 2021 @08:23PM (#29610489)
And with the NFT, it doesn't show that you are the rewarded user, just that you have the trophy, since it could be transferred.
Re:An NFT without a blockchain by 3371 on Sunday December 19, 2021 @11:02PM (#29621452)
- This is the case only if we put aside web3.

- NFT can have data on the .json file, so the rewarded user can be recorded.

Re:An NFT without a blockchain by eightysixfour on Saturday December 18, 2021 @10:01PM (#29610941)
Just that you are the wallet holder, the contract could block transfers.