Third High Severity CVE in Log4j Is Published

Re:Third High Severity CVE in Log4j Is Published by diob on Saturday December 18, 2021 @03:29PM (#29608210)

So happy to see this as the top comment. We need way more positivity in tech.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Third High Severity CVE in Log4j Is Published by vmception on Saturday December 18, 2021 @06:48PM (#29609905)

I thought it was satire, but I guess that says more about me

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Third High Severity CVE in Log4j Is Published by throwuxiytayq on Saturday December 18, 2021 @05:19PM (#29609129)

I was here just to say this - seeing this comment at the top of the thread restores my faith in people.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Third High Severity CVE in Log4j Is Published by wyager on Saturday December 18, 2021 @03:56PM (#29608427)

Do we? Or does "positivity" enable insecure software because there isn't enough social pressure against making dangerous engineering decisions?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Third High Severity CVE in Log4j Is Published by watwut on Saturday December 18, 2021 @04:17PM (#29608599)

Are you saying there would be more security issues if we thanked maintainers more?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Third High Severity CVE in Log4j Is Published by wyager on Saturday December 18, 2021 @07:26PM (#29610169)

Only if we thank maintainers specifically after they get bad publicity for a big security issue.

[ Parent | on HN ]