News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Harvard won’t require SAT or ACT through 2026 as test-opt... by mbg721 on Saturday December 18, 2021 @12:01AM (#29601817)
"What proportion (of x ethnic group) would you like?" is a question that greatly devalues the contributions of the individual student. Would you say, "You're a great interview candidate, but we already have a tall guy,"?
Re:Harvard won’t require SAT or ACT through 2026 as test-opt... by perl4ever on Saturday December 18, 2021 @12:37AM (#29601994)
I was told a story about someone who applied to a school of engineering somewhere or other, in the latter part of the 1950s.

She had a sterling high school record, but they wrote a rejection letter explaining that they already had a woman attending the institution.

The punch line, as it were, as I recall it, was that "a woman" did not mean one undergraduate woman, but just one, period.

So, she went to a much less prestigious and well-known school, majored in math, and ended up being a programmer instead of an engineer.

I am not sure if she was bitter about it.

Re:Harvard won’t require SAT or ACT through 2026 as test-opt... by kenjackson on Saturday December 18, 2021 @09:50AM (#29604854)
Happens all the time in sports.

And really we do it for college too. Except it is “we already have enough comp science majors”.

Re:Harvard won’t require SAT or ACT through 2026 as test-opt... by thomasz on Saturday December 18, 2021 @02:39PM (#29607814)
Discrimination happens when you treat equals as unequal, or unequals as equal. There is a world of difference between "we already have enough asian compsci majors", and "we already have enough compsci majors, but there is room for a sociologist".
Re:Harvard won’t require SAT or ACT through 2026 as test-opt... by slavboj on Saturday December 18, 2021 @08:17AM (#29604261)
Surely you're aware that this literally and explicitly happens in the context of college admissions. "We already have a couple tuba players, try Yale."