Re:Netflix Executive Sentenced to 30 Months for 700K Bribes,...
by stefan_ on Friday December 17, 2021 @01:23PM
(#29596101)
There is no magic loophole by giving people stuff rather than paying them money directly. In tax law this is just called a non-cash benefit and it is taxable all the same. I'm sure the people writing corruption guidelines had the same insight.
Re:Netflix Executive Sentenced to 30 Months for 700K Bribes,...
by ghaff on Friday December 17, 2021 @01:33PM
(#29596247)
The "loophole" is that, for gifts of more than a token amount, it has to be a legitimate business expense--whoever is picking up the bill. Waiving a conference fee and covering some or all of the travel expenses to a conference, would widely be considered legitimate business expenses. Normally these would be picked up by my company these days if I had a business reason to attend an event and I need to pay for registration and travel. But conference organizers routinely waive at least the conference fees for journalists, analysts, speakers, and possibly others they want to attend.
Re:Netflix Executive Sentenced to 30 Months for 700K Bribes,...
by spockz on Friday December 17, 2021 @01:15PM
(#29595964)
Working in finance, I have to report any gift above €50. This includes when I would receive a gift or lottery for a training, a conference, etc. So for us it is at least treated like a potential personal payment.
Companies pick up at least some expenses for customers, partners, journalists, analysts, etc. to attend business events all the time. And everyone involved is very clear about the difference between that and handing them a stack of bills under the table.
(And speaking for myself, I can think of a lot of places that I'd rather be than Las Vegas for re:Invent.)