Virtualized desktops have been solved. All the major players offer them. FFS, you can run Xbox One games in the cloud and play in your browser now.
For large companies supplying VDI to consultants tend to be an standardized package that gets billed back to whatever project is hiring the consultants but for mid-sized organisation VDI is a big scary word that's going to require special handling.
Most desktop support teams are completely dependent on standardization to the point where they tend to turn into complete control freaks, that panic at the thought of anything that is not "by the book", so they often just apply the book without additional budgets to external consultants.
It’s not a hard rule. It’s just one of a number of tests. But contractors are generally expected to provide their own tools.
I probably was more of a “temporary employee” than a contractor. But what’s the difference at that point? I was paid more than the value of entitlements as cash. It suited both parties, and was mutually agreed.
In hindsight, having them provide the hardware, and then handing it back at the end of the engagement would be my preference. It reduced any risks for them and me.
Tho I can easily imagine on/off or short infrequent contracting scenarios that this would not work for.
If you’re a temporary employee, the employer is responsible for payroll taxes, and has additional obligations to you (depending on the state). You’re obligations— both to your employer and to the IRS—are different as well.
I’m addition to unlawfully skirting regulations, misclassifying an employee as a contractor is essentially stealing from the employee by reducing the company’s tax burden and increasing the employee’s.
If you want to be really cheeky, could get some value-added margin on it too, and as a bonus, AIUI it would be yours to keep after the engagement, rather than having to return hardware they've assigned to you.
Might be tough to get past finance though, unless they really want that certification :)
I’ve recently been contracting and the only private account I used was GitHub, and that was a conscious decision to maintain a single public developer identity.
Otherwise, I expected them to provide all hardware and software required to perform my role.
And likewise, for security purposes, that’s exactly what they wanted as well.
Tho I would note, they wanted to perform a background check prior to starting. And while i didn’t have a problem with the employer having those details (for the period of the contract) they performed this function through a 3rd party, who has stated they won’t delete my data (I will be following up post-contract). I was not happy for a 3rd party to have this data.
I would also not login to or install any apps, or certificates on my phone. Again, if that’s required, send me a phone.
The company I was working for had SOC2 / ISO2700 / what ever and I think this is exactly why they wanted all this. But it suited me to seperate things as well.