News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Pelosi defends stock trading by lawmakers. ‘We are a free... by lkrubner on Thursday December 16, 2021 @02:06PM (#29582373)
True, though the ratio of 15 to 45 is better than the ratio of 2 to 45. I'm assuming there is some law of diminishing returns here, that hasn't set in at 2 or 4 years, but has set in by 15 years. In other words, a politician who has to run for office every 2 years is powerless in the face of civil servants, whereas a political who runs for office every 15 years definitely has the time needed to force a showdown with civil servants, whenever civil servants are acting in a rogue manner.
Re:Pelosi defends stock trading by lawmakers. ‘We are a free... by dragonwriter on Thursday December 16, 2021 @02:14PM (#29582485)
> True, though the ratio of 15 to 45 is better than the ratio of 2 to 45.

Senate terms are 6 years, not 2.

Re:Pelosi defends stock trading by lawmakers. ‘We are a free... by bumby on Thursday December 16, 2021 @04:56PM (#29584513)
Are we still talking about Pelosi? She’s not a Senator
Re:Pelosi defends stock trading by lawmakers. ‘We are a free... by dragonwriter on Thursday December 16, 2021 @08:23PM (#29586527)
> Are we still talking about Pelosi? She’s not a Senator

We’re talking about the suggestion “if every Senator were elected for 15 years...

Which, yes, was an odd suggestion in this thread for the reason you point out, sure.

Re:Pelosi defends stock trading by lawmakers. ‘We are a free... by bumby on Thursday December 16, 2021 @09:04PM (#29586854)
Thanks for clarifying, it was a bit hard for me to follow on mobile