Re:Pelosi defends stock trading by lawmakers. ‘We are a free...
by lkrubner on Thursday December 16, 2021 @02:06PM
(#29582373)
True, though the ratio of 15 to 45 is better than the ratio of 2 to 45. I'm assuming there is some law of diminishing returns here, that hasn't set in at 2 or 4 years, but has set in by 15 years. In other words, a politician who has to run for office every 2 years is powerless in the face of civil servants, whereas a political who runs for office every 15 years definitely has the time needed to force a showdown with civil servants, whenever civil servants are acting in a rogue manner.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Pelosi defends stock trading by lawmakers. ‘We are a free...
by dragonwriter on Thursday December 16, 2021 @02:14PM
(#29582485)
> True, though the ratio of 15 to 45 is better than the ratio of 2 to 45.
Senate terms are 6 years, not 2.
Re:Pelosi defends stock trading by lawmakers. ‘We are a free...
by bumby on Thursday December 16, 2021 @04:56PM
(#29584513)
Are we still talking about Pelosi? She’s not a Senator
Re:Pelosi defends stock trading by lawmakers. ‘We are a free...
by dragonwriter on Thursday December 16, 2021 @08:23PM
(#29586527)
> Are we still talking about Pelosi? She’s not a Senator
We’re talking about the suggestion “if every Senator were elected for 15 years...
Which, yes, was an odd suggestion in this thread for the reason you point out, sure.