A Conflict of Blurred Visions: Response to Scott Alexander on Ivermectin

Re:A Conflict of Blurred Visions: Response to Scott Alexande... by dekhn on Thursday December 16, 2021 @10:14AM (#29578930)

flagged because aspiring philosophers are not qualified to evaluate medical studies.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:A Conflict of Blurred Visions: Response to Scott Alexande... by jb1991 on Friday December 17, 2021 @04:17AM (#29589766)

I notice you often flag articles without actually diving into them to see if they are in fact without the merit you claim.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:A Conflict of Blurred Visions: Response to Scott Alexande... by dekhn on Friday December 17, 2021 @10:01AM (#29593047)

I read the article, it's not very useful.

Philosophers writing about ivermectin are just wasting everybody's time. The medical community moved on a while ago.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:A Conflict of Blurred Visions: Response to Scott Alexande... by DrHilarius on Thursday December 16, 2021 @02:02PM (#29582328)

Would think it would then be a trivial matter to point to some sort of actual errors in reasoning or conclusions in the actual post.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:A Conflict of Blurred Visions: Response to Scott Alexande... by jb1991 on Friday December 17, 2021 @04:17AM (#29589769)

This is the MO of the OP.

[ Parent | on HN ]