News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:No limit to maximal lifespan in humans: how to beat a 122... by maerF0x0 on Thursday December 16, 2021 @12:41AM (#29575337)
> - Will over-population become a serious issue

Over population is a function of choosing to have children. I still think people who have children are not being properly held accountable for the outcomes of their choices -- look at how over populated countries are now the most polluting (even with low per capital pollution). Somehow responsible countries are held to task for their per capita pollution, but not credited with not having created massive amounts of people?

Re:No limit to maximal lifespan in humans: how to beat a 122... by imoverclocked on Thursday December 16, 2021 @06:20PM (#29585406)
> Over population is a function of choosing to have children.

It's also a function of how long we live.

It's also a function of how long we wait to have those children.

If we start having kids at 15 and we live until 25, we have ~2 generations hanging around. If we start having kids at 25 and live to 90, we often have 3-4 generations hanging around. There is a lot of good info from searching "How does life expectancy affect population growth?"

The fertility rate of some stage 4 countries is so low that the countries are in need of more babies. There is plenty of data on this but my favorite anecdotally is "Do it for Denmark"