Re:Apple removes references to CSAM from its child safety w...
by nomel on Wednesday December 15, 2021 @03:12PM
(#29571015)
That's incorrect. That's the Apple reviewer. After that, it goes to further review by NCMEC, where it's verified. NCMEC is the only one legally capable of verifying it, fully, and they're the ones that file the police report.
So, to get flagged, you need many hash collisions destined for iCloud. Then, to get reported, some number must get a false positives in the Apple review, and then some number must somehow fail the full review by NCMEC.
Re:Apple removes references to CSAM from its child safety w...
by zionic on Wednesday December 15, 2021 @11:49PM
(#29575015)
I envy your naïveté. My world would be so much less complex with your child-like acceptance.
Re:Apple removes references to CSAM from its child safety w...
by nomel on Thursday December 16, 2021 @08:00PM
(#29586316)
You’re assuming quite a bit here. I never claimed to have faith in the system, and there could be problems with the review process, but it’s best to talk about how things are, from an informed perspective.
A "third party" paid by apple who is totally-not-a-cop who sees a 50x50pz grayscale "image derivative" is in charge of hitting "is CP" or "Is not CP".
I don't understand how anyone can have faith in such a design.