Re:Apple removes references to CSAM from its child safety w...
by sweetheart on Wednesday December 15, 2021 @10:28AM
(#29567188)
We have literally no reason to think it's an issue. The burden of proof is on those who believe its a threat, not those who believe it isn't.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Apple removes references to CSAM from its child safety w...
by zionic on Wednesday December 15, 2021 @12:41PM
(#29569121)
"Burden of proof"? Seems like it's pretty hard to prove what intelligence agencies are doing.
Also, there's the fun "you can't sue us because you have no standing/can't show harm, and showing harm to prove you have standing would be illegal".
Re:Apple removes references to CSAM from its child safety w...
by sweetheart on Wednesday December 15, 2021 @01:27PM
(#29569726)
> "Burden of proof"?
Yes, here you go: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burden_of_proof_(philosophy)